Author Topic: Newsview :Commentary: The First Amendment Decision Nobody's Talking About  (Read 162 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

News View

  • Guest

NEWSVIEW PRESENTS

NewsView

Your View - thats NewView


Commentary: The First Amendment Decision Nobody's Talking About

While the Hobby Lobby case is higher profile, the Supreme Court's unanimous First Amendment decision last week has greater staying power.

   The Supreme Court decided an important First Amendment case this past week. But it wasn't Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. On Thursday, a unanimous Court struck down a Massachusetts law that restricted peaceful expression on public streets and sidewalks outside of abortion clinics. And those who care about religious liberty should know at least as much about that case, McCullen v. Coakley, as they do about the more narrowly decided case with which the Court ended its term.

   To be sure, Hobby Lobby is an important decision. The Court rightly concluded that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) protects certain kinds of corporations from federal laws that substantially burden the exercise of religion. As Justice Alito wrote for the majority, "Congress enacted RFRA in 1993 in order to provide very broad protections for religious liberty."

   But this also means Hobby Lobby was decided based on a federal law, not the Constitution. From the Court's point of view, the case had nothing to do with the First Amendment—and if it had, Hobby Lobby and its owners might not have prevailed. Indeed, the reason that Congress overwhelmingly passed RFRA in the first place (97-3 in the Senate, by acclamation in the House) was a disturbing Supreme Court decision in 1990, Employment Division v. Smith, which lowered the First Amendment's protections for religious liberty. The decision in Smith held that the First Amendment provided no special protection for religious liberty claims brought against "generally applicable laws."

   Since most laws (possibly including the contraceptive mandate at issue in the Hobby Lobby case) are generally applicable, Smith in effect meant that the government could prevail over ...Continue reading...

Source: Commentary: The First Amendment Decision Nobody's Talking About




Daily Newsview: see more @ Faithq

Asking Questions, getting Answers








http://feeds.christianitytoday.com/~r/christianitytoday/hottopics/~3/ecXpXgp4pE0/first-amendment-decision-mccullen-coakley-hobby-lobby.html
http://faithq.co.uk/index.php/newsviewchristiannews



NEWSVIEW PRESENTS

NewsView

Your View - thats NewView


Alien-R

  • Guest
The first amendment - freedom of speech / religious liberty

Biblical example : Exodus 4:11-12 Freedom of speech within guidelines of Holy Spirit leading

NEWSVIEW PRESENTS

NewsView

Your View - thats NewView